CVE Database

A vulnerability has been identified in Capital Embedded AR Classic 431-422 (All versions), Capital Embedded AR Classic R20-11 (All versions < V2303), Desigo PXC00-E.D (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC00-U (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC001-E.D (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC100-E.D (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC12-E.D (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC128-U (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC200-E.D (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC22-E.D (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC22.1-E.D (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC36.1-E.D (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC50-E.D (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC64-U (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXM20-E (All versions >= V2.3). The affected product does not properly validate input bounds before accessing packet data. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to trigger memory reads outside the intended packet boundaries.

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly perform server-side authorization checks for requests to modify the state of scheduled actions. This could allow an authenticated attacker with minimal privileges to retry, stop, or delete scheduled tasks without proper authorization.

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly perform server-side authorization checks for requests to schedule special operations. This could allow an authenticated attacker with minimal privileges to schedule unauthorized operations on devices.

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly restrict access to database queries used for subnet management. This could allow an authenticated attacker to read, modify, or delete subnet configurations, leading to unauthorized information disclosure and data manipulation.

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly restrict access to various database queries, allowing users to retrieve system-wide information that is not intended for their privilege level. This could allow an authenticated attacker to gather sensitive information about the system's infrastructure, including details on all devices, substations, users, and scheduled activities.

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly validate or sanitize input in device group or facility names processed during the Bulk Export workflow. This could allow an authenticated attacker with specific privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the underlying database.

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly validate or sanitize input in the Name and Value fields for custom file labels. This could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the underlying database.

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly restrict access to sensitive configuration items via specific database queries. This could allow an authenticated attacker to retrieve administrative credentials for various internal systems, leading to unauthorized information disclosure and privilege escalation.

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly validate or sanitize the filename of firmware files uploaded to the system. This could allow an authenticated attacker with specific privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the underlying database.

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly validate or sanitize input in facility names processed during the Bulk Import/Export workflow. This could allow an authenticated attacker with specific privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the underlying database.

A vulnerability has been identified in .NET Client Library for SIMATIC S7 Webserver API (All versions < V3.3.62). Affected applications do not properly redact PLC restore passwords from HTTP error exception messages. This could allow an attacker with access to logs or other diagnostic output to obtain the plaintext restore password and potentially perform unauthorized operations on the PLC.

A vulnerability has been identified in Industrial Edge App Publisher (All versions < V1.27.9). The application fails to properly sanitize or escape data received from the backend before rendering it in the user interface. Because the front end is integrated with Node.js, this vulnerability allows for the execution of arbitrary JavaScript, which can be leveraged to achieve remote code execution (RCE) on the victim's machine

A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC IPC BX-21A (All versions < V31.01.13), SIMATIC IPC RW-543A (All versions < V1.1.4), SIMATIC IPC227G / IPC277G / IPC277G PRO / IPC327G / IPC377G (All versions < V28.01.15). A BIOS vendor test key is present in the UEFI Secure Boot key database. This could allow a local attacker with physical or administrative access to the device to boot an operating system or UEFI application signed with that test key, bypassing UEFI Secure Boot protections even when Secure Boot is enabled, potentially leading to a full loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the device.

Affected devices do not properly sanitize calculated signal data contained in imported calculated signal files before rendering it on the Trace page. This could allow an attacker to social engineer an authorized user who holds the function right “Read diagnostics” into importing a specially crafted file. Successful exploitation could allow attacker-controlled JavaScript to execute in the user’s browser session and perform PLC operations through the web server within the scope of the user’s authorization.

Affected devices do not properly sanitize calculated signal names contained in imported CSV trace files before including them in error messages on the Trace page. This could allow an attacker to social engineer an authorized user who holds the function right “Read diagnostics” into importing a specially crafted trace file. Attacker-controlled JavaScript could be executed in the user’s browser session when the resulting error message is displayed.

Affected devices do not properly sanitize signal names contained in imported CSV trace files before rendering them in selection menus on the Trace page. This could allow an attacker to social engineer an authorized user who holds the function right “Read diagnostics” into importing a specially crafted trace file. Attacker-controlled JavaScript could be executed in the user’s browser session when the user subsequently interacts with an affected selection menu.

Affected devices do not properly sanitize comment fields contained in imported trace files before rendering them on the Trace page. This could allow an attacker to social engineer an authorized user who holds the function right “Read diagnostics” into importing a specially crafted trace file. Successful exploitation could allow attacker-controlled JavaScript to execute in the user’s browser session and perform PLC operations through the web server within the scope of the user’s authorization.

Affected devices do not properly sanitize calculated signal data contained in imported CSV trace files before rendering it on the Trace page. This could allow an attacker to social engineer an authorized user who holds the function right “Read diagnostics” into importing a specially crafted trace file. Successful exploitation could allow attacker-controlled JavaScript to execute in the user’s browser session and perform PLC operations through the web server within the scope of the user’s authorization.

Affected devices do not properly validate and sanitize visual properties of calculated signals contained in imported CSV trace files before rendering them on the Trace page. This could allow an attacker to social engineer an authorized user who holds the function right “Read diagnostics” into importing a specially crafted trace file. Successful exploitation could allow attacker-controlled JavaScript to execute in the user’s browser session and perform PLC operations through the web server within the scope of the user’s authorization.

Affected devices do not properly restrict executable content contained in imported trace files. This could allow an attacker to social engineer an authorized user who holds the function right “Read diagnostics” into importing a specially crafted trace file. Successful exploitation could allow attacker-controlled JavaScript to execute in the user’s browser session and perform PLC operations through the web server within the scope of the user’s authorization.

Affected systems do not properly restrict access to internal APIs and paths for authenticated users. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to access sensitive internal information, which in the worst case could be leveraged to facilitate unauthorized access to the system or result in the deletion of data.

A vulnerability has been identified in Industrial Edge Cloud Device (IECD), Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.10, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.11, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.12, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.13, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.14, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.15, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.16, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.17, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.18, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.19, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.20, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.21, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.22, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.23, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.24, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.25, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.26, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.27, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.28, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.5, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.6, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.7, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.8, Industrial Edge Device Kit - arm64 V1.9, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.10, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.11, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.12, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.13, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.14, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.15, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.16, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.17, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.18, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.19, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.20, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.21, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.22, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.23, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.24, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.25, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.26, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.27, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.28, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.5, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.6, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.7, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.8, Industrial Edge Device Kit - x86-64 V1.9, Industrial Edge Own Device (IEOD), Industrial Edge Virtual Device (IEVD), SCALANCE LPE9413 (6GK5998-3GS01-2AC2), SCALANCE LPE9433 (6GK5998-3GS11-2AC2), SIMATIC IoT2050 Advanced IED (6ES7647-0BW00-1YA2), SIMATIC IoT2050 SM IED (6ES7647-0CW00-1AA2), SIMATIC IPC BX-21A Industrial Edge Device, SIMATIC IPC BX-39A Industrial Edge Device, SIMATIC IPC BX-59A Industrial Edge Device, SIMATIC IPC127E Industrial Edge Device, SIMATIC IPC227E Industrial Edge Device, SIMATIC IPC227G Industrial Edge Device, SIMATIC IPC427E Industrial Edge Device, SIMATIC IPC847E Industrial Edge Device. Affected systems do not properly restrict access to internal APIs and paths for authenticated users. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to access sensitive internal information, which in the worst case could be leveraged to facilitate unauthorized access to the system.

A vulnerability has been identified in APOGEE MBC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MBC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE PXC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), APOGEE PXC Compact (P2 Ethernet) (All versions < V2.8.21), APOGEE PXC Modular (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), APOGEE PXC Modular (P2 Ethernet) (All versions < V2.8.21), TALON TC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), TALON TC Modular (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7). The affected product web service does not properly validate user-supplied input in upload code. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

A vulnerability has been identified in APOGEE MBC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MBC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE PXC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), APOGEE PXC Compact (P2 Ethernet) (All versions < V2.8.21), APOGEE PXC Modular (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), APOGEE PXC Modular (P2 Ethernet) (All versions < V2.8.21), TALON TC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), TALON TC Modular (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7). The affected product web service does not properly validate user input in multipart handling. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

A vulnerability has been identified in APOGEE MBC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MBC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (PPC) (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE MEC (PPC) (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), APOGEE PXC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), APOGEE PXC Compact (P2 Ethernet) (All versions < V2.8.21), APOGEE PXC Modular (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), APOGEE PXC Modular (P2 Ethernet) (All versions < V2.8.21), TALON TC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7), TALON TC Modular (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.7). The affected product FTP service does not properly validate the length of user-controllable input. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a denial of service.