CVE Database
Search and filter vulnerabilities by ID, vendor, product, severity, or description.
Search and filter vulnerabilities by ID, vendor, product, severity, or description.
| CVE ID | Severity | Score | Description | Published | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-84036 | HIGH | 7.4 | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authorization. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-84034 | HIGH | 8.8 | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a hardcoded credentials vulnerability in the hardware_assess/obstore binaries. A low-privileged authenticated user can recover hardcoded product master secrets, potentially resulting in unauthorized access to the internal database and compromise of sensitive system information. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-84031 | CRITICAL | 9.0 | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-82967 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to an authentication bypass that allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass IP-based access controls and access the Guardium management interface. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-82896 | HIGH | 7.6 | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to traverse directories on the system due to a path traversal vulnerability. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-82893 | HIGH | 7.8 | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a local attacker to gain elevated privileges due to improper privilege management. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-82892 | HIGH | 8.1 | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-82890 | MEDIUM | 5.9 | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-82887 | HIGH | 8.8 | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-82885 | HIGH | 8.8 | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to gain elevated privileges due to missing authorization in the REST API. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-82832 | CRITICAL | 9.6 | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-82340 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to unauthenticated insecure deserialization and attacker-controlled reflective method dispatch in the Change Audit System (CAS) listener. A network attacker able to reach TCP port 16017 may submit crafted serialized messages and potentially cause unintended code execution in the Guardium appliance. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-81937 | HIGH | 7.2 | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a command injection vulnerability in the import remotelog_config file CLI command. A highly privileged authenticated user can inject shell commands through the filename parameter, potentially resulting in arbitrary command execution with root privileges and impact to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-81933 | HIGH | 8.8 | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a SQL injection vulnerability in the Analytic Grid Service Handler. A low-privileged authenticated user can inject SQL statements through the analytic cases grid endpoint, potentially resulting in unauthorized access to sensitive data and impact to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-81669 | HIGH | 7.2 | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a command injection vulnerability in the create csr wildcard CLI command. An authenticated privileged CLI user can inject arbitrary shell commands through the alias input, resulting in command execution with root privileges. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-81657 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system due to the deserialization of untrusted data. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-81656 | HIGH | 8.8 | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a SQL injection vulnerability in the New Query Builder REST Processor. A low-privileged authenticated user can inject SQL statements through the newQueryBuilder REST endpoint, potentially resulting in unauthorized access to data and impact to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-81626 | HIGH | 8.6 | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a SQL injection vulnerability in the Load Balancer Groups component. An unauthenticated user can inject SQL statements through the Load Balancer Servlet endpoint, potentially resulting in unauthorized access to data and impact to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-81623 | MEDIUM | 6.3 | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands with low user privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-80442 | CRITICAL | 9.9 | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to an authenticated OS command injection vulnerability in the exportCertificate functionality. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute unauthorized commands and impact the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-80441 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to an unauthenticated second-order SQL injection vulnerability in the generateInsertQuery functionality of change-tracker-data.sql. A remote attacker could inject malicious SQL that is subsequently processed by the application, potentially resulting in compromise of the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-77528 | MEDIUM | 5.3 | Autobahn Python is a WebSocket and WAMP implementation for Python that supports Twisted and asyncio. Prior to 26.7.1, WebSocket endpoints that accept permessage-deflate and rely on maxMessagePayloadSize enforce that limit against the compressed frame length before inflation but do not recheck the decompressed message size before delivery. A remote unauthenticated client can send a valid compressed frame below the configured wire-size limit that expands beyond the application message limit, causing oversized data to be allocated, joined, validated, and passed to application callbacks. This can create resource-exhaustion pressure, but the advisory does not establish confidentiality or integrity impact. This issue is fixed in version 26.7.1. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-76902 | MEDIUM | 5.0 | CordysCRM is an open source AI-powered customer relationship management system that supports private deployment. Prior to 1.7.4, ShiroFilter configures /attachment/preview/{id} and /pic/preview/{id} as anonymous, and both routes call AttachmentService.getResource, which performs a bare primary-key lookup without ownership, organization, or permission checks. An unauthenticated caller who guesses or observes an id generated by IDGenerator.nextStr can download files uploaded by users in other organizations because the stored organization id is used only to locate the file rather than authorize the caller. This issue is fixed in version 1.7.4. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-76901 | MEDIUM | 5.8 | CordysCRM is an open source AI-powered customer relationship management system that supports private deployment. Prior to 1.7.4, GET /pool/lead/get/{id} in PoolClueController.get and GET /pool/account/get/{id} in PoolCustomerController.get use bare pool-read permission checks without the CsPermission resourceId binding that enforces per-record data scope. An authenticated user with the ordinary CLUE_MANAGEMENT_POOL:READ or CUSTOMER_MANAGEMENT_POOL:READ permission can supply another record's id and cause unscoped primary-key getters to return leads or accounts owned by other users, departments, or organizations. Exposed data includes contact names, phone numbers, owner and department attribution, and custom field values. This issue is fixed in version 1.7.4. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-76900 | MEDIUM | 6.8 | CordysCRM is an open source AI-powered customer relationship management system that supports private deployment. In version 1.7.3, ApprovalResourceService.sendWebHook reads WebHookConfig.webHookUrl from stored approval-node configuration and passes it through ApprovalFlowService.updateApprovalPostField to HttpClientUtils without the SSRF validation used by the optional testConnect path. A user with PROCESS_SETTING_ADD can configure an internal URL through POST /approval-flow/add and cause the server to request it when POST /approval-action/approve executes the approval action, enabling cloud metadata access, internal network reconnaissance, and interaction with reachable internal services. This issue is fixed in version 1.7.4. | Sep 18, 2026 |