CVE Database
Search and filter vulnerabilities by ID, vendor, product, severity, or description.
Search and filter vulnerabilities by ID, vendor, product, severity, or description.
| CVE ID | Severity | Score | Description | Published | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-93762 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Mongoid contains an unsafe reflection weakness in the query path used for embedded documents. An application that passes an externally supplied field name to certain in-memory query methods may allow an unauthenticated party to obtain unintended disclosure of stored document data and to permanently remove stored records. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-93761 | HIGH | 7.5 | An inefficient regular expression complexity issue in the in-memory query evaluation component of the Mongoid library may allow an unauthenticated party to cause excessive processing within an embedding application process. Applications that place user-supplied text into a pattern-matching query condition on an embedded association may become unresponsive. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-93760 | HIGH | 8.2 | Mongoid does not restrict which query operators may come from caller-supplied filter data when an application hands that data to its query-building methods. In an application that forwards externally supplied filter parameters in this way, a party with no credentials may influence how the database evaluates the query. This may result in unintended disclosure of stored field values and in reduced database performance. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-93759 | HIGH | 8.6 | Mongoid does not neutralize a string-typed query criterion supplied to its query builder, and instead passes it to the database as a server-side JavaScript expression. An unauthenticated party able to influence the value an application supplies as a query argument may cause code of their choosing to be evaluated by the database engine. This may result in unintended disclosure of stored field values, unintended selection of documents for application-initiated writes, and reduced database performance. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-93753 | UNKNOWN | — | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected because it does not describe a security vulnerability. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-93752 | HIGH | 7.5 | CSSOM through 0.5.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability in CSSStyleDeclaration.setProperty() that fails to validate reserved property names. Attackers can supply a stylesheet with a declaration named length to replace the internal counter and trigger excessive memory allocation during cssText serialization, causing process termination. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-93751 | MEDIUM | 6.5 | uri-js through 4.4.1 contains an improper UTF-8 decoding vulnerability in pctDecChars() that decodes invalid and overlong percent-encoded sequences into ASCII metacharacters. Attackers can craft percent-encoded payloads to bypass platform decoder validation and inject path traversal or CRLF sequences that downstream consumers process without filtering. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-93750 | MEDIUM | 5.9 | http-cache-semantics through 4.2.0 contains a cache validation vulnerability in the _varyMatches() function that fails to properly validate Vary header wildcards due to byte-for-byte string comparison. Attackers can request URLs previously fetched by other clients to receive cached responses intended for different users, disclosing sensitive information across clients. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-93749 | HIGH | 7.5 | source-map-js through 1.2.1 fails to validate the per-section offset line value in indexed source maps, allowing attackers to specify arbitrary numeric values. Attackers can supply extremely large offset line values that cause synchronous event loop blocking for extended periods, preventing the service from handling other requests. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-93748 | HIGH | 7.5 | http-cache-semantics through 4.2.0 fails to properly validate security-zeroed cache entries when processing client max-stale directives, allowing unauthenticated attackers to retrieve cached responses belonging to other users. Attackers can request the same URL with a large max-stale value to obtain another user's Set-Cookie session credentials from shared-cache entries that were deliberately zeroed for security reasons. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-93432 | MEDIUM | 6.1 | A flaw was found in the Quarkus Qute template engine. When the {#eval} section helper processes a sub-template, it fails to pass the parent template's content type information. This bypasses standard escaping mechanisms, allowing untrusted data to be output as raw, unescaped text. This vulnerability can lead to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) and JSON Injection, potentially allowing a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code in a user's browser or manipulate data. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-92768 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | A flaw was found in cockpit-machines. This vulnerability allows a local attacker to expose sensitive Virtual Machine (VM) credentials, including plaintext passwords, by inspecting process command-line arguments during VM creation or installation. The cockpit-machines component passes password values directly on the command line, making them visible to other local users on systems where process arguments are not restricted. Successful exploitation leads to information disclosure, potentially compromising VM access. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-92747 | MEDIUM | 5.0 | A flaw was found in `cockpit-machines`. This vulnerability allows a local attacker with the ability to inspect running processes to expose sensitive guest virtual machine (VM) credentials, such as `rootPassword` and `userPassword`. This occurs when the `install_machine.py` script passes these credentials as a JSON command-line argument during VM creation or installation. The exposure is limited to the period when the installation workflow is active and depends on host process-visibility policies. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-92745 | MEDIUM | 5.0 | A flaw was found in cockpit-machines. This vulnerability allows a local attacker with the ability to inspect process metadata to disclose a sensitive Red Hat Subscription Management (RHSM) offline token. The token is exposed when it is passed as a command-line argument to a helper script during the token validation process. Successful exploitation could lead to the compromise of confidentiality, as the exposed token can be used to request access tokens. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-92702 | CRITICAL | 9.1 | Cocos AI is a confidential computing system for running AI workloads inside trusted execution environments. In versions up to and including 0.8.2, the intra-handshake attested TLS (aTLS) AMD SEV-SNP verification path does not enforce attestation freshness when the expected reportData value is nil, empty, or omitted, leaving the SEV-SNP policy ReportData unset so the verifier accepts unrelated or stale Evidence not bound to the current connection. A relying party that uses this path without an expected reportData as a trust or authorization decision can be induced to trust an unintended attestation context; a supplied non-empty reportData is still validated. The issue is fixed in version 0.9.0. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-92701 | CRITICAL | 9.1 | Cocos AI is a confidential computing system for running AI workloads inside trusted execution environments. In versions up to and including 0.8.2, the intra-handshake attested TLS (aTLS) Intel TDX verification path does not copy the expected current-session freshness value into the TDX quote-body policy before quote validation, so structurally valid TDX QuoteV4 Evidence is accepted without checking that its REPORT_DATA field matches the reportData expected for the current session. A relying party using this path can therefore accept Evidence with a mismatched or reused reportData and release application data after the handshake, enabling session-misbinding to an unintended attestation context. The issue is fixed in version 0.9.0. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-91127 | HIGH | 8.2 | File Viewer is a browser-native viewer for Office, PDF, CAD, archive, and other files in private and internal web applications. Prior to @file-viewer/doc 2.3.1 and msdoc-viewer 0.2.2, the legacy DOC renderer emitted document-controlled hyperlink targets into generated HTML after character escaping but without restricting URL schemes. A crafted legacy DOC file could place javascript:, vbscript:, data:, or another unsafe scheme in a rendered link, and script could execute in the embedding application's origin when a user clicked the link. The fix blocks external document links by default, allows only HTTP(S), mail, telephone, safe relative URLs, and internal bookmarks when external links are explicitly enabled, and applies mount-boundary sanitization as defense in depth. This issue is fixed in @file-viewer/doc 2.3.1 and msdoc-viewer 0.2.2. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-85058 | HIGH | 7.5 | Moquette is a lightweight Java MQTT broker. Prior to 0.18.1, PostOffice.publishWill publishes a client-controlled Last Will message through publish2Subscribers without invoking the authorizator.canWrite check used by normal PUBLISH paths. When anonymous access is enabled and topic ACLs restrict writes, a remote client can set an ACL-protected topic as the Last Will Topic during CONNECT and perform an abnormal client disconnect, causing the broker to inject attacker-controlled messages into a topic for which the client lacks write permission. This issue is fixed in version 0.18.1. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-84992 | MEDIUM | 6.1 | md-editor-v3 is a Markdown editor for Vue 3 developed in JSX and TypeScript. Prior to 6.5.4, MdPreview's useMarkdownIt() highlight callback in packages/MdEditor/layouts/Content/composition/useMarkdownIt.ts inserts a fenced-code language value into class and language HTML attributes without escaping or consistently quoting it. Both highlighted and non-highlighted rendering paths reach this return value, while XSSPlugin filters only existing html_block and html_inline tokens before rendering and therefore cannot inspect the renderer-generated HTML. An attacker who can supply Markdown can use crafted fenced-code metadata to execute JavaScript in the application origin when a victim renders it, including as stored cross-site scripting when the host persists the Markdown. This issue is fixed in version 6.5.4 | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-84975 | HIGH | 7.4 | PJSIP is a free and open source multimedia communication library written in C. In 2.17 and earlier, the OpenSSL and GnuTLS backends in pjlib/src/pj/ssl_sock_ossl.c and pjlib/src/pj/ssl_sock_gtls.c copy DNS SubjectAltName values with string functions that recalculate their length and truncate an embedded NUL byte. With server verification enabled through --tls-verify-server for the PJSIP TLS/SIPS transport, a certificate containing a DNS SubjectAltName formed from the target hostname prefix followed by an embedded NUL and an attacker-controlled suffix can therefore be accepted for the prefix hostname. An attacker who possesses such a certificate from a trusted issuer and can intercept the connection can impersonate the target server, complete the SIP session, and receive REGISTER credentials. The mbedTLS backend is not affected because it preserves the explicit string length. No fixed version is available as of this review. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-81182 | MEDIUM | 4.2 | SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2026.68, an unauthenticated attacker who holds a public read-write note share link can disclose an uploaded file or image from the same project by updating the shared note to reference the target asset filename. The user-controlled reference causes the shared-note authorization logic to treat the asset as permitted, after which the attacker can download it. The attacker must know the asset filename, and the issue does not permit cross-project access. This issue is fixed in version 2026.68. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-81181 | LOW | 3.7 | SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2026.68, the password authentication flow for protected shared notes does not rotate the session identifier after successful authentication, allowing session fixation. An attacker who can obtain an unauthenticated SysReptor session cookie, place it in a victim's browser, and know the shared-note URL where the victim authenticates can reuse the fixed session after the victim enters the correct password and access that shared note. The main SysReptor login flow is not affected. This issue is fixed in version 2026.68. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-81180 | HIGH | 8.8 | SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2026.61, authenticated users of SysReptor Professional can upload image files whose formats cause image processing to invoke Ghostscript, allowing embedded PostScript to operate in the shared temporary directory. An attacker can combine that behavior with a race involving GnuPG configuration files in temporary subdirectories to cause GnuPG to copy attacker-controlled Python code into the application code directory. The injected code executes with the privileges of the SysReptor application process after a worker restart. The Community edition is not affected. Version 2026.58 contains a partial mitigation, and this issue is fully fixed in version 2026.61. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-81179 | HIGH | 8.1 | SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2026.58, installations that enable password reset by email while configuring ALLOWED_HOSTS with a wildcard accept an attacker-controlled Host header when generating a password reset link. An unauthenticated attacker can request a reset email whose link points to an attacker-controlled system, and a victim who follows that link can disclose the reset token, allowing the attacker to reset the victim's password and take over the account. Exploitation also requires a configured email gateway and an email address for the victim, while some reverse proxy configurations may reject the hostile Host header. This issue is fixed in version 2026.58. | Sep 18, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-81178 | LOW | 3.5 | SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2026.55, an unauthenticated holder of a public note share link receives project-wide collaborative editing metadata because the public share consumer joins the same collaboration group as authenticated project members and forwards client information, connection, awareness, and deletion events without consistently restricting them to the shared note subtree. The disclosed metadata can identify project members through usernames and names and reveal the identifiers and live editing activity of notes that were not shared. The content of non-shared notes remains protected, and the issue does not grant write access. This issue is fixed in version 2026.55. | Sep 18, 2026 |