CVE Database
Search and filter vulnerabilities by ID, vendor, product, severity, or description.
Search and filter vulnerabilities by ID, vendor, product, severity, or description.
| CVE ID | Severity | Score | Description | Published | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-92178 | HIGH | 7.8 | pdfforge PDF Architect PDF File Parsing Memory Corruption Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of pdfforge PDF Architect. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a memory corruption condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-28916. | Sep 15, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-92177 | HIGH | 7.8 | pdfforge PDF Architect PDF File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of pdfforge PDF Architect. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-28673. | Sep 15, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-92176 | HIGH | 7.8 | pdfforge PDF Architect App Object Out-Of-Bounds Read Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of pdfforge PDF Architect. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of App objects. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-28570. | Sep 15, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-90971 | UNKNOWN | — | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the VMware synchronization feature in Devolutions Server 2026.2.16 and earlier allows a low-privileged authenticated user to obtain other users' credentials and reach internal or cloud-metadata network endpoints via a crafted connection definition submitted for datacenter discovery. | Sep 15, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-90969 | UNKNOWN | — | Improper access control in the vault entry listing feature in Devolutions Server 2026.2.16 and earlier allows an authenticated user lacking the view-password permission to obtain cleartext passwords via a request to the entry listing endpoint with password disclosure parameters. | Sep 15, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-84850 | UNKNOWN | — | Improper certificate validation in the shared HTTP client used by synchronization and integration features in Devolutions Server 2026.2.16 and earlier allows a network-positioned attacker to intercept and tamper with outbound TLS connections via a spoofed or self-signed certificate. | Sep 15, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-84048 | UNKNOWN | — | Joomla Extension - joomgalleryfriends.net - Unauthenticated arbitrary file upload via the TUS endpoint in JoomGallery < 4.4.1 - The TUS endpoint allows arbitrary file uploads, however neither file name nor file extension are under attacker control. Code execution requires non-standard server configuration. | Sep 15, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-82191 | UNKNOWN | — | Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Unescaped request data reflected into PayPal notify redirect in J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.2, 4.0.0-4.0.22, 4.1.0-4.1.7 - A crafted link to the paypal notify endpoint, if followed by a victim's browser (or an automated system that fetches it), causes the resulting redirect to `com_j2store`'s checkout controller to carry attacker-chosen query parameters instead of only the intended `view=checkout&task=confirmPayment&orderpayment_type=...&paction=process` set — parameter injection/smuggling into that follow-up request. This requires a victim to load the crafted link (`UI:R`/`UI:P`); it does not by itself grant an unauthenticated attacker anything they could not already obtain by requesting the target `com_j2store` URL directly with their own parameters. | Sep 15, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-82190 | UNKNOWN | — | Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Predictable/forgeable order access token in J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.2, 4.0.0-4.0.22, 4.1.0-4.1.7 - Anyone who obtains the site's Joomla `secret` can compute a valid access token for *any* order on the site without ever having placed one, gaining guest access to that order's details and any purchased digital downloads. Because the token is never rotated, this exposure persists indefinitely even after the underlying secret-disclosure vector is patched, unless the Joomla secret itself is also rotated. The attack complexity (`AC:H`) is high because it depends on the secret already being known through a separate vector; it is not directly exploitable by an anonymous visitor with no other foothold. | Sep 15, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-82189 | UNKNOWN | — | Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Any order can be marked Failed by anyone in J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.2, 4.0.0-4.0.22, 4.1.0-4.1.7 - Unauthenticated denial-of-service against the order pipeline: mass-failing pending orders to disrupt revenue and force manual reprocessing, or flipping already-fulfilled orders back to `FAILED` to cause operational confusion (unwarranted refunds/cancellations, customer-support load). Unlike the earlier confirmation-fraud issue, this required no correct payment amount or transaction data at all. | Sep 15, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-81924 | MEDIUM | 6.5 | Concrete CMS before 9.5.3 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the theme page-template activation feature. The Dashboard theme Inspect controller's activate_files() action created PageTemplate records from attacker-supplied pageTemplates[] values without validating an anti-CSRF token.A remote attacker could host a page that auto-submitted a forged POST request; when a signed-in administrator visited it, the request executed under the administrator's session and created theme page-template records, changing site configuration without the administrator's consent. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 2.1 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Andrew Gonzalez for reporting. | Sep 15, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-81923 | LOW | 2.7 | In Concrete CMS before 9.5.3, the SEO Bulk Update Meta Tags editor did not check per-page edit permissions before saving. The saveRecord() action validated the per-page CSRF token but never called canEditPageProperties() for the target page, so a user who was granted access to the bulk SEO tool and could view (but not edit) a given page was able to change that page's meta title, meta description, and URL handle outside their edit scope, tampering with the presentation and live URLs of otherwise protected content. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 2.1 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Andrew Gonzalez for reporting. | Sep 15, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-81922 | LOW | 2.7 | Concrete CMS before 9.5.3 did not enforce a per-page authorization check when reordering pages from the sitemap. In the sitemap Explore dashboard controller, the send_to_top and send_to_bottom reorder tasks ran after only a generic sitemap-access check; the controller loaded the page named by the attacker-controlled cNodeID parameter and changed its display order without verifying that the current user held move or arrange permission on that specific page. Because of this, an authenticated user who could reach the sitemap but had no edit or arrange rights on a given page could still move that page and alter the site's global navigation order. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 2.1 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Andrew Gonzalez for reporting. | Sep 15, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-81921 | MEDIUM | 5.4 | Concrete CMS 8.5.3 through 9.5.2 enabled the OAuth 2.0 refresh-token grant using the unmodified upstream League grant, which issued new access tokens from a valid refresh token without re-checking the associated account's active status. A user who obtained a refresh token while active could therefore continue to mint valid access tokens after being deactivated or suspended (uIsActive=0), so deactivating an account did not revoke its API access. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L. Thanks sh4d0byss for reporting. | Sep 15, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-81920 | MEDIUM | 4.3 | Concrete CMS below 9.5.3 was vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in the dashboard SEO Excluded Words page. The reset() controller action cleared the administrator-configured reserved-word list (concrete.seo.exclude_words) but did not validate the anti-CSRF token that the reset modal emitted, and it did not restrict the request to the POST method. A remote attacker who lured an authenticated user with SEO access to a crafted page could revert the reserved-word list to its default and silently alter future URL-slug generation for pages, files, topics, and other objects created through the Text urlify service, undoing the site's configured SEO slug policy. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks riodrwn for reporting. | Sep 15, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-81919 | MEDIUM | 4.3 | Concrete CMS below 9.5.3 did not validate an anti-CSRF token on the block-arrangement backend endpoint (the arrange() action of Concrete\Controller\Backend\Page\ArrangeBlocks). The action enforced page-edit authorization but performed no token check, and its route accepted any HTTP method, so an attacker could induce a signed-in content editor into loading an attacker-controlled page that auto-submitted a cross-site request and reordered or moved blocks in the draft version of a page the victim was permitted to edit. The default null cookie SameSite configuration let the victim's session cookie accompany the forged request. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori from Tenzai for reporting. | Sep 15, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-81568 | UNKNOWN | — | Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Arbitrary file read via `task=download` in J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.2, 4.0.0-4.0.22, 4.1.0-4.1.7 - `J2StoreModelOrderdownloads::getFilePath()` built the on-disk path to a purchased digital download by concatenating the configured attachment folder with the product file's stored `product_file_save_name`, using only `JPath::clean()` (which normalises separators but does not resolve or reject `..` segments) and a plain `JFile::exists()` check — never confirming the resolved path stayed inside the configured attachment folder. If a product file's `product_file_save_name` ever contained a `../` traversal segment — most plausibly via the CSRF-forgeable admin product-file save actions described in Issue 1, but equally by any future integration or bug that writes that field — any customer holding a valid download `token`/`pid` pair for that product file could have the traversal resolve to a path outside the attachment folder and download any file readable by the web server (e.g. `configuration.php`). | Sep 15, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-81567 | UNKNOWN | — | Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Unauthenticated blind SQL injection in the storefront product list in J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.2, 4.0.0-4.0.22, 4.1.0-4.1.7 - Unauthenticated, blind extraction of arbitrary database content (e.g. customer records, order data, stored credentials/tokens) via boolean- or time-based inference, reachable on any public storefront that exposes the standard product listing or product-tags filter. | Sep 15, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-79411 | HIGH | 8.8 | Incorrect privilege assignment in the admin user-management component of Webkul Bagisto 2.4.9 allows an authenticated backend user holding only the settings.users.edit permission to escalate to full administrator. The user-update endpoint (route admin.settings.users.update, UserController::update()) does not verify that the actor is permitted to grant the requested role, does not prevent a user from changing their own role, and does not restrict assignment to roles whose permission set is a subset of the actor's own. By submitting a request that sets role_id to the Administrator role for their own account, a low-privileged administrator gains every admin-panel capability, including store configuration, payment gateway credentials, and customer PII. | Sep 15, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-79410 | HIGH | 8.1 | Improper validation of the quantity parameter in the add-to-cart path of Webkul Bagisto v2.4.9 allows authenticated attackers to reduce their order total below the legitimate price of shippable goods. | Sep 15, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-79409 | MEDIUM | 6.5 | An issue in Webkul Bagisto 2.4.9 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the add-to-cart API and the downloadable fulfilment components. | Sep 15, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-78081 | UNKNOWN | — | Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Missing CSRF protection on cart, checkout and myprofile controllers in J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.2, 4.0.0-4.0.22, 4.1.0-4.1.7 - A forged request riding a victim's active checkout session could silently overwrite the billing or shipping address before order confirmation — the most consequential sub-case, since it opens the door to redirecting a paid order's goods to an attacker-controlled address — or tamper with a saved profile address via `saveAddress()`. As before, each forged request executes with only the victim's own session privileges, so there is no cross-account data access. | Sep 15, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-73467 | MEDIUM | 6.3 | On affected platforms running Arista EOS, under certain circumstances plaintext shared secrets for configured Terminal Access Controller Access-Control System Plus (TACACS+) servers | Sep 15, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-73466 | MEDIUM | 6.3 | On affected platforms running Arista EOS, under certain circumstances user passwordss may be written in clear text to log files during operations when specialized non-standard debugging trace levels are explicitly enabled. To exploit these vulnerabilities, a malicious actor must already possess authenticated local administrative access to the device shell, and specialized non-standard debugging trace levels must be explicitly enabled. This issue was discovered internally by Arista, and the company is not aware of any malicious exploitation of this vulnerability in customer networks. | Sep 15, 2026 | |
| CVE-2026-73465 | MEDIUM | 6.3 | On affected platforms running Arista EOS, under certain circumstances plaintext private keys may be written in clear text to log files during operations when specialized non-standard debugging trace levels are explicitly enabled. To exploit these vulnerabilities, a malicious actor must already possess authenticated local administrative access to the device shell, and specialized non-standard debugging trace levels must be explicitly enabled. This issue was discovered internally by Arista, and the company is not aware of any malicious exploitation of this vulnerability in customer networks. | Sep 15, 2026 |